Repeated “a”, and “dativo de interés”(1) In this sentence the personal “a” is repeated: “ A Pedro y a Pablo les cantaron una canción por su despedida”.
However in this sentence the second “a” is omitted: “ (Les) cantaron una canción a Pedro y Pablo por su despedida.”
Is the second “a” arbitrary or is there a rule for when to omit it?
(2) I notice two uses of IO pronouns in the examples and questions.
The first is the common usage such as giving something to someone, saying something to someone, or taking something from someone. This usage always has a direct object.
The second usage is from a lesson from a higher level, called the “dativo de interés”, which has an entirely different meaning altogether. Instead of always having a DO and giving the DO to someone, there may not be a directobject at all (intransitive verbs), and the IO simply emphasizes that someone is affected by the action.
Sometimes there is a DO: Mi hija pequeña no me come nada.
and sometimes there is not: Ayer nos cayó un buen chaparrón.
Inma’s answer to Thea reflects this type of usage.
Spanish dativo de interés - specific use of Spanish indirect object pronouns
So there are different layers to the usage of the IO.
Could you make a lesson contrasting the different types of IO usage? It could be useful for many of us.
If the main clause uses a tense or a mood that implies a future action, for example El Imperativo or El Futuro Simple, then the por si/por si acaso clause uses El Presente (probable) or El Pretérito Imperfecto Subjuntivo (less probable)
Looking forward to seeing some content here.
Gracias
I was searching for a little information on reflexive verbs and ended up with the best lesson yet! By following the links at Reflexive verbs I found so much valuable information that I'll be breathless for the next few days as I absorb it all . . .Thanks Inma
I'm reassured to see that even Mexican reporters sometimes conjugate their verbs incorrectly.
(1) In this sentence the personal “a” is repeated: “ A Pedro y a Pablo les cantaron una canción por su despedida”.
However in this sentence the second “a” is omitted: “ (Les) cantaron una canción a Pedro y Pablo por su despedida.”
Is the second “a” arbitrary or is there a rule for when to omit it?
(2) I notice two uses of IO pronouns in the examples and questions.
The first is the common usage such as giving something to someone, saying something to someone, or taking something from someone. This usage always has a direct object.
The second usage is from a lesson from a higher level, called the “dativo de interés”, which has an entirely different meaning altogether. Instead of always having a DO and giving the DO to someone, there may not be a directobject at all (intransitive verbs), and the IO simply emphasizes that someone is affected by the action.
Sometimes there is a DO: Mi hija pequeña no me come nada.
and sometimes there is not: Ayer nos cayó un buen chaparrón.
Inma’s answer to Thea reflects this type of usage.
Spanish dativo de interés - specific use of Spanish indirect object pronouns
So there are different layers to the usage of the IO.
Could you make a lesson contrasting the different types of IO usage? It could be useful for many of us.
For the question, "I love going out with you," wouldn't one use the familiar you "me gustas" instead of the (subject: usted/she/he/it) "me gusta?"
Para muchas personas de todo el mundo, las supersticiones basadas en la "religión" no son más que una broma de mal gusto.
Para los cristianos, Jesús era el número 1, el líder, y tenía 12 apóstoles. El número 13 ni siquiera debería considerarse, ¡a menos que se quiera culpar a María Magdalena!
Lo mismo ocurre con Martes, que en latín significa el Dios de la Guerra, pero en español, Tuesday no tiene nada que ver con la desgracia o la guerra, mientras que, al ser el lunes el primer día laborable después del fin de semana, la mayoría de los empleados no están concentrados en su trabajo y es entonces cuando ocurren los accidentes laborales, pero cuando el miércoles llegue, ya están contando los días para volver al fin de semana.
Y, ¿mano izquierda, lado izquierdo, pie izquierdo? De nuevo, "siniestro" podría tener una conotación religiosa con la Inquisición y las brujas, pero cualquier adulto no inculcado en una religión considera que la superstición es infantilmente inmadura.
No obstante, es un gran ejercicio de lectura.
can i clarify that why isn't "hay tantas cosas por hacer" correct instead of "Hay tantas cosas que hacer"? It would be useful if you could direct me to the relevant notes, if there is.
Another question is that, why is "todos los vecinos de la comunidad" using tuvimos instead of tuvieron when they had a meeting?
One last one is to clarify is "representar" + preposition A, a fixed expression to express on behalf of (someone) and that in this sentence, it is not personal A because we are referring to a general group of people? or the group of neighbors are not considered as general but specific persons?
Your replies are much appreciated. thanks.
Estoy referido al ejercicio: "El Real Madrid marcó menos goles (de/que) goles de Barça este año.
Más de/menos de, se usan en candidades, no? En el ejercicio anterior los goles se refierien a una cantidad, creo yo.
Gracias y le agradezco.
Juan
With body parts the possessive pronoun often is not used. E.g me duele el cuerpo. My body hurts. Why not in this text?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level