He + Quedado+ Con¡Hola, Inma!
En un intento de utilizarte como última opción, me he puesto en contacto con mi primo en Chile y mi amigo en Guatemala, pero ni siquiera pueden responder a mi pregunta, así que contaré con tu ayuda.
Re: To arrange a date / to meet
The construction of He + Quedado + Con makes perfect when making simple two party statements, but what I cannot figure out is how to keep the same He + Quedado + Con structure when adding another party.
Example:
I have arranged to meet the plumber at 4 PM = He quedado con el fontanero a las 4.
But... How do I keep the same structure and say, "I have arranged for US to meet the plumber at 4."?
Todas mis amigas españolas me dicen que no es posible con esta estructura de la oración, pero no lo creo.
Gracias, Pato Quique
we can say: Would you mind me raising my price for the following packages you buy
we can say: Would you mind me raising my price for the following packages you are buying/ you are going to buy/ even: you will be buying, but:
iI don´t think we can say: Would you mind me raising my price for the following packages you WILL buy
can we? why?
I see in this lesson that when the subject is the same, we should be using the infinitive. I need to work on that!
Is it ever a “tolerable” error among native speakers to commit this mistake when using a colloquial register? I frequently want to say things like “Dudo que (yo) pueda hacerlo para viernes” instead of “poder hacerlo.” I know you’re here to teach us the right way!! Just curious as to “how” wrong it is.
Hi there, In English it would be ‘rims of the glasses’ not ‘rim of the glasses’. The sentence you have written for translation uses the singular, which is incorrect. Rims would be in the plural, not singular. In Spanish it appears the singular is used not the plural ‘frota el borde de los vasos’. Is this correct?
Tú moriste de sed en el desierto.
:-)
Hello is this verb correct- "arrascar"? I didn't find it in the spanishdict.com and other dictionaries I use. There is only "rascar".
"Oviedo is a city in the north of Spain" was missing from the translation?
I get it. Le is not the correct answer for a reason, but not the reason given in the lesson examples. Just because the preposition "con" is always followed by a subject pronoun is insufficient explanation. It implies that "con" was already a given, but it was not. I believe that "le" is an indirect object/pronoun and therefore not correct.
¡Hola, Inma!
En un intento de utilizarte como última opción, me he puesto en contacto con mi primo en Chile y mi amigo en Guatemala, pero ni siquiera pueden responder a mi pregunta, así que contaré con tu ayuda.
Re: To arrange a date / to meet
The construction of He + Quedado + Con makes perfect when making simple two party statements, but what I cannot figure out is how to keep the same He + Quedado + Con structure when adding another party.
Example:
I have arranged to meet the plumber at 4 PM = He quedado con el fontanero a las 4.
But... How do I keep the same structure and say, "I have arranged for US to meet the plumber at 4."?
Todas mis amigas españolas me dicen que no es posible con esta estructura de la oración, pero no lo creo.
Gracias, Pato Quique
Thanks for explaining, shirley.
Parece ser que ________ un malentendido. It looks like it is a misunderstanding.tratatrata dese trata deFind your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level