Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,070 questions • 9,924 answers • 1,029,947 learners
Getting that for you now...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,070 questions • 9,924 answers • 1,029,947 learners
Buenas team,
Just to confirm - we say: me gusta el chocolate, and we also say me gusta comer chocolate?
We don't say me gusta comer el chocolate?
The definite article is always removed when we have the verb there?
Muchisimas gracias,
Why is it esta rather than estan when referring to las oficinas (plural of office)?
A suggestion, add “Cuando plus subjunctive” to the title. It would be easier to search for a lesson on when to use the subj with cuando.
Shirley.
We would be wrong with you.
I would say "We would be wrong about you."
Could you explain the distinctions between:
"Cristina sería una buena madre." "Cristina será una buena madre." "Cristina va a ser una buena madre."
I understand the difference between the first and the last, but I don't understand how the second version is distinct from those two.
En el diccionario esta palabra no existe - solo herbívoras
As an English speaker, it is very difficult to learn and apply indirect objects in Spanish.
I understand why you need les in the following sentence. It is because you are making dinner "for them." However is there an easy way to remember this construction when you are actually talking. I seem to understand it when I read it, but don't seem to be able to apply indirect objects when I try to speak. Is this common? How do I overcome it? It is like you are saying for them twice. Once as the pronoun "les" and once as "a nuestros invitados.
Nosotros les preparamos la cena a nuestros invitados.We are cooking dinner for our guests.
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level