Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,946 questions • 9,716 answers • 988,708 learners
Getting that for you now...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,946 questions • 9,716 answers • 988,708 learners
My answer: Comprend tanto carne que pescado. this was marked wrong. Why would it be tanta when carne is masculine?
why don´t we use the preterite imperfect or preterite, as the event has happened already in the past and the preterite perfect gives some sense that it is still continuing?
These are words are relative pronouns, but can they ever be used in a question as an interrogative pronoun? I assume that function is reserved for Cuál and Cuáles without el-lo-la-las.
Next, could "cuáles" be used in this quiz sentence: Voy a preguntar a la dependienta ________ lavadoras son más eficientes. trying to ask: which ones of these washing machines are more efficient?
Does "al ser" in this exercise mean "being"? Is there a document/lesson that talks about that? Thanks!
No entiendo por qué la traducción de "por los propios festeros" será "by party-goers themselves"
"festero" significa "party-goer"??
Shouldn't be: "había objetos de ESTE metal."?
"la agencia" is singular. So why "tienen" coches. What not "tiene". Is this just the (poor) way people speak? For example they refer to a team as "they" instead of "it"?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level