Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,079 questions • 9,957 answers • 1,037,245 learners
Thinking...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,079 questions • 9,957 answers • 1,037,245 learners
Hi,
I don't understand how the above sentence can translate as 'They say that love conquers all'. There doesn't seem to be a word that would translate as to conquer.
Or am I missing something?
Gracias.
Saludos,
Colin
why do you add "me" as in me comería, or me compraría. Just for emphasis? Can one do away with the "me"?
In the above example from a kwizz I understand the use of the present participle but should the subjunctive conjugation of seguir and continuar not be used here? Thanks
1. why is the answer sentence being phrased as 'the idea attracted me' when the sentence given is I was attracted to the idea?
2. it a esquiar a Europa. why does it uses 'a' instead of 'en'?
3. en Argentina se pueden practica... why is this se pueden in plural and not se puede in singular?
3. drop by is given as dejarse caer por.. can we still use pasar por?
Hola,
My translators consistently omit the "unos" before "270 huesos" in the phrase "pero los bebés nacen con unos 270 huesos que se fusionan con el tiempo". Is it grammatically correct to exclude the unos ? Or is it included simply for aesthetic reasons?
Saludos
Kevin
Is las required with desde/hasta?
Gracias, Shirley.
One of the examples is:
Su actitud se volvió violenta de repente.
Is it correct to assume that the change is a lasting one, as with someone who got hit on the head with a shovel and after that was a violent person?
Compared to:
Su actitud se puso violenta de repente.
In this case, cowboys in a saloon in a Western movie insult someone and he stands up quickly and draws his gun?
Just want to double check that these differences are correct. Thanks.
"quien había fallecido"
Just wondering, why is it que in the first example and quien in the second?
Hola Inma,
Is there a reason why the construction “llegar a conocerse” doesn’t work in this context?
I felt that the text “get to know each other” required something that would capture the process over time [llegar a], rather than simply the reflexive verb [conocerse], or is it simpler than that? Saludos. John
Can you explain what an impersonal verb is an how I know when to use it, please?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level