Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,961 questions • 9,741 answers • 993,867 learners
Clever stuff happening!
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,961 questions • 9,741 answers • 993,867 learners
In Thea question in the quiz, they give you the hint to conjugate hacer in el conditional simple which I did but my answer was marked as wrong. Can you explain why please? Thank you
Hi, being back after a few months, I noticed that all example sentences use indicative mood, while the one in the lessons was in subjunctive:
De habérmelo explicado antes, no me hubiera enfadado tanto.
Why isn't this conditional, ... no me habría enfadado tanto?
Should violeta also be on this list?
and when I looked in a spanish (does this have Cap) violet was also given. This might be usual mean not invariable. Or maybe that was giving the meaning. I think giving the meaning. carro had car and cart
I am getting thoroughly confused. What is the difference between the two ?
I know the preterite and the present perfect. Never heard of preterito indefinido
Sure "agua"means "water" but I think in this case the singer was saying "Look out now!" as a heads up for the band rhythm solo . . .
hola no entiendo la diferencia entre "terminar por/participio" y "terminar de". por favor cuanteme!
when choosing adjectives for las lámparas, rosa but not rosas was offered as a choice. Why not rosas?
You said the answer was supé and not supe. I have been unable to find an example in your lesson that uses the accent mark. What am I missing here and where can I find an example of supe with the accent mark along with an explanation_
Could you highlight this difference in the lesson in yellow or some sort of emphasis?
If we want to express the same but in the negative, the structure changes to:
llevar (conjugated) + sin + infinitive
And also, if correct, please add the explanation that the action changes from past participle to infinitive because sin is a preposition, and that prepositions are followed by infinitives, not past particples.
When would you use this vs. the regular imperative? Are they exchangeable or is one preferred over the other under certain circumstances?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level