Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,750 questions • 9,379 answers • 929,647 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,750 questions • 9,379 answers • 929,647 learners
Please check this question.
When I did this quiz a few minutes ago, I only had the choice of one answer. It turns out that there were three correct answers so I received partial credit. I added it to my notebook to look at the question again, but once again it did not offer the ability to check multiple boxes.
You only give two forms- "todavia no [verb]" and "no [verb] todavia", yet a vast majority of your sentences are "no [entire sentence] todavia" as you put "yet" at the end of the sentence. But, even when you do put the word "yet" early in the sentence, you still require "no [entire sentence] todavia" as the answer, which is not even an option in the instructions above. It makes it very frustrating as I am struggling with a recent surge in progress and trying to solidify it and work my way through A2. Your site is wonderful, but there are a few frustrating areas :)
Hola. Creo que los ejemplos en esta lista son del pretérito y no del presente de subjuntivo.
Gracias.
Por que "la montaña"' en ingles "the mountains" Should be las montañas?
In the section about no porque you say: "if the causal subordinate clause is negative, it allows both the indicative and the subjunctive (without changing the meaning)."
A says that no porque must be used with the subjunctive according to the Cervantes Institute, and you (Inma) seem to agree with him, saying: "with no porque you use the subjunctive."
I just did a Kwiz where "no porque era" was a correct option.
So, what is going on there? Can no porque take both the subjunctive and the indicative or just the subjunctive?
Is it correct, in addition to "Whose books are those?" that this could also be translated as "From whom are those books?" I realize that in a perfect world, the context would clear up any ambiguity, but am I correct that the latter is a valid translation?
Thanks!
Hola,
The first sentence above uses 'mayor' to mean eldest. How would you say 'elder'?
How can you be sure which is meant between the two?
How do you for the superlatives and the opposites (the least) of the comparatives?
Muchas gracias.
Saludos,
Colin
?Son iguales, no?:
Hace anos iba a esa clase
Hace anos solia ir a esa clase.
In one quiz answer it marked me wrong for choosing “Se llama [girl’s name],” saying I should have chosen “Ella se llama…” Then in the next quiz I chose “Él se llama” and it was marked wrong, saying I should have chosen “Se llama.” I’m confused, what is the difference?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
Test your Spanish to the CEFR standard
Find your Spanish level