Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,062 questions • 9,916 answers • 1,028,901 learners
Clever stuff happening!
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,062 questions • 9,916 answers • 1,028,901 learners
I wonder why this is referred to as se aspectual, because it can be any reflexive pronoun?
Since The main differences between ser and estar include that ser is used for permanent qualities, like your name, your place of origin, and your physical appearance, while estar is used to talk about temporary situations, such as how you’re feeling right now or your location.
So why is SER used in this sentence: Tú eras muy bueno. - the person that you are talking to is not always good so it is not a permant state.
Ditto in the following sentence. You are not always rich so why use SER in the following: Vosotros erais ricos.
To say sth is protected, are está and es interchangeable or is one preferred than the other?
Is there a way to eliminate vosotros from lessons and quizzes? It's not something I've ever studied or used.
I read from the other answers that common names such as Juan and proper nouns such as movie are unable to use direct object pronouns.
Example - lo he visto pelicula is wrong but he visto pelicula is correct?
Example - lo he visto a Juan is wrong but he visto a Juan or lo he visto is correct?
how about el pelicula de Pedro lo he visto
or
he visto el pelicula de Pedro?
Thanks in advance
Does it matter when you use which?
Here in Mexico it is common to say “cervesa bien fría”. (Just to reinforce what you Mentioned about Latin American usage).
Is querría actually wrong on this case to say "I would like to see the paintings"?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level