Spanish language Q&A Forum

Why not use "te" as the indirect object?

Why the speaker can see him/herself in this time frame? It's obvious that the speaker is talking about someone else.

Thank u so much

Nice lesson! In what cases would use of the definite article be mandatory, grammatically speaking?

Also, as far as I can tell, the pronoun's gender does not relate to the gender of a person, the definite article can provide that clarification when needed.

Thank you.

When a noun is used to describe the weather, hacer is used  but when an adjective or participle is used then the verb is estar: En otoño, hace viento -v- en otoño está ventoso. 

Pero why is ser used for: en otoño es incomodo? Or should it be está?

#46. I must be missing something. Why is seguí estudiando better than continué estudiando?

The sound stops halfway through this example:

Yo voy al gimnasio, no porque me gusta, sino porque debo perder peso.I go to the gym, not because I like it, but because I must lose weight.

In the first and the last but one example, could it instead be "no más de unas monedas", "no más de unos minutos", and if so, would it have a different meaning/connotation?