Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,013 questions • 9,828 answers • 1,013,280 learners
Clever stuff happening!
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,013 questions • 9,828 answers • 1,013,280 learners
If one translates: "I learned everything"
It is written: "J'ai tout appris."
But if I translate: "I learned everything I needed to know"
It is written: "J'ai appris tout ce que j'avais besoin de savoir."
Why does "tout" move out from between the verb to behind it? Is it because of the subordinate phrase?
I thought Ojalá had the accent on the last A.
I don't understand the example sentence " Ninguna chica viajará contigo a ninguna parte". The tip says that you can only use the words "ningun" or "Ninguna" at the beginning of a sentence, so this example sentence does not make sense to me since " Ninguna" Is found towards the end of the sentence too. Thank you.
2nd paragraph: Is there a lesson that discusses "que" used to mean "to be?"
I searched on "que" and got 1620 hits, so I scanned the first 60 and did not see "que" and "to be" in any lesson title.
I have taken this test several times. Each time I check Comprad tanto carne como pescado, it marks me as choosing tanta.
Would the present subjunctive ever be permissible in these constructions or only the imperfect subjunctive?
I understand when the pronoun replace a thing use Los or Las, lo or la but the quiz is using Los to replace a miguel y a Jose. is the hing that an artricle is in front of the names
Are there structural clues we can look for to determine whether "que" is meant to express a wish vs. disbelief or would it be contextual? I ask since sometimes the disbelief version can be followed by the subjunctive.
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level