la cosa que, cosa queMe cancelaron el viaje, cosa que me fastidió mucho.
They cancelled my trip, which annoyed me a lot.
this sentence uses cosa que in the middle of the sentence
the notes state otherwise using la cosa que and it says only for beginning of the sentence not middle
am i right to conclude, cosa que = lo que in the middle of the sentence, whereas la cosa que = lo que in the beginning of the sentence.
can i also further conclude below
Le encantan los documentales de historia, cosa que/que/lo que/lo cual (yo) encuentro aburrido = I find [the fact] that she loves history documentaries boring.
cosa que/que/lo que/lo cual are all interchangeable and replacement with no change in the meaning in the middle of the sentence?
la cosa que/lo que for the beginning of the sentence.
It says above "if the sentence has me, te, se, le, nos, os, les then no goes in front of these"
But what about direct object pronouns los, las, lo, la?
In what context can we use them both? E.g can I say hay/hace una tormenta? Or ... Hay/hace mucho frío?
These answer options all have a capital "J" for the month "Julio". Debo coger vacaciones en Julio. Queréis coger vacaciones en Julio. Debéis coger vacaciones en Julio. Podéis coger vacaciones en Julio. Months in spanish are usually not capitalised unless at the beginning of a sentence or have I missed something?
In the beginning of the story, using present perfect was clear because she is saying that her best friend has come to visit. Afterwards, when she is narrating what they did each day, we have specific time (the day mentioned) and what they did which to me seems to be how we use preterite for a specific time (day) in the past, so it is confusing to see present perfect for specific time events in the past. Can you please explain why you continued to use pr. perfect and did not switch to another tense. To me (the "has come" in the beginning) would have been more appropriate with what they are going to do in the future since she mentions that "they have made tons on plans."
In a test question, I answered “Nosotros nos llamamos Ana y Maria” and was marked incorrect, with “Nos llamamos Ana y Maria” offered as the correct answer, yet.......your lesson on reflexive verbs uses nosotros nos in an example. I am aware that the pronouns can often be dropped but I feel a bit cheated given it is used in the lesson example and not accepted in my answer in the test question.
With the above question, "lo de" was said to be the answer. However, there is a conjugated verb in the clause afterward, "fue". Why isn;t the correct answer "lo de que"? With a conjugated verb, the explanation says to use "lo de que".
In the A2 quiz, this question came up. I understand I should have picked A mí tampoco AND yo tampoco, but it looks like 'yo tampoco' is marked as incorrect.
Me cancelaron el viaje, cosa que me fastidió mucho.
They cancelled my trip, which annoyed me a lot.
this sentence uses cosa que in the middle of the sentence
the notes state otherwise using la cosa que and it says only for beginning of the sentence not middle
am i right to conclude, cosa que = lo que in the middle of the sentence, whereas la cosa que = lo que in the beginning of the sentence.
can i also further conclude below
Le encantan los documentales de historia, cosa que/que/lo que/lo cual (yo) encuentro aburrido = I find [the fact] that she loves history documentaries boring.
cosa que/que/lo que/lo cual are all interchangeable and replacement with no change in the meaning in the middle of the sentence?
la cosa que/lo que for the beginning of the sentence.
Buenas tardes,
Sólo quiero decir gracias a Shui por todos los ejercicios- 'Daily dose of Positivity'- que nos da.
Son una buena distracción durante este tiempo difícil.
¡Gracias Shui!
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level