la cosa que, cosa queMe cancelaron el viaje, cosa que me fastidió mucho.
They cancelled my trip, which annoyed me a lot.
this sentence uses cosa que in the middle of the sentence
the notes state otherwise using la cosa que and it says only for beginning of the sentence not middle
am i right to conclude, cosa que = lo que in the middle of the sentence, whereas la cosa que = lo que in the beginning of the sentence.
can i also further conclude below
Le encantan los documentales de historia, cosa que/que/lo que/lo cual (yo) encuentro aburrido = I find [the fact] that she loves history documentaries boring.
cosa que/que/lo que/lo cual are all interchangeable and replacement with no change in the meaning in the middle of the sentence?
la cosa que/lo que for the beginning of the sentence.
I have taken this test several times. Each time I check Comprad tanto carne como pescado, it marks me as choosing tanta.
Someone else has asked a similar question but in regards to the interchangeability of the tenses, if you were to say "You could have called me the whole evening", can you still say "Podrías/Podías haberme llamado toda la tarde" or do you have to use "Pudiste haberme llamado toda la tarde" because it is in a set time frame now?
Puede explicar con mas detalle cuando se usa el preterito imperfecto y cuando se usa el preterito perfecto, por favor?
In this question (I waited for them), it appears to me that "them" is an indirect object pronoun. Below, Gruff, a Kwiziq team member says this. However, this question is answered by using a direct object pronoun. I got it wrong when I used the indirect pronoun. Which is it? I would appreciate having this clarified as I keep getting this question and I don't know how to answer it. Thanks,
Why not use "te" as the indirect object?
In what context can we use them both? E.g can I say hay/hace una tormenta? Or ... Hay/hace mucho frío?
Me cancelaron el viaje, cosa que me fastidió mucho.
They cancelled my trip, which annoyed me a lot.
this sentence uses cosa que in the middle of the sentence
the notes state otherwise using la cosa que and it says only for beginning of the sentence not middle
am i right to conclude, cosa que = lo que in the middle of the sentence, whereas la cosa que = lo que in the beginning of the sentence.
can i also further conclude below
Le encantan los documentales de historia, cosa que/que/lo que/lo cual (yo) encuentro aburrido = I find [the fact] that she loves history documentaries boring.
cosa que/que/lo que/lo cual are all interchangeable and replacement with no change in the meaning in the middle of the sentence?
la cosa que/lo que for the beginning of the sentence.
Hola,
Bit confused by the stipulation for this. Is it purely down to the speaker’s discretion as to whether a definitive article is required post ‘de’?
I see examples with and examples without and am confused where the line is.
Gracias,
Regarding the hints in the tests. Sometimes the hint says to conjugate in "El pretérito Perfecto Compuesto" and other times just "El pretérito Perfecto". If I enter El pretérito Perfecto simple it's incorrect. The study buttons take you to the same lesson, and seem to be asking for the same answer, am I missing something?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level