Spanish language Q&A Forum

Why do we need the indirect pronoun in this sentence at all as Flor is referred to by name?

Is it just for emphasis, would a natural speaker include it?

Are there structural clues we can look for to determine whether "que" is meant to express a wish vs. disbelief or would it be contextual? I ask since sometimes the disbelief version can be followed by the subjunctive. 

hay un fantasma de una mujer que no deja de quejarse de sus desgracias

Por que no decir: Estoy estando coger el tren en una hora. Or Soy yendo . . . .

El idea fue de Julián. 

Male would be el 

Female would be la

Es correcto?

The answer instructions don't say to answer all that could be correct or just one answer.

Are points taken off for just giving one correct answer?

Voy a perderme el viaje a Cuba a menos que ________ un milagro. Why is the answer " occura" if it follows an adverbial clause. Shouldn't it be in the subjunctive form?

This is an excellent lesson.  Very clearly explained.

I understand the idea of using the imperfect to picture what is happening in the moment.  But there is another tense for this as well.  I forget the name of it, so I will just use an example.

"La profesora abría la puerta."

"La profesora estaba abriendo la puerta."

Would the choice between these two tenses be up to the speaker, or would there be a grammatical rule that tells us which one to use?

Thanks.