Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,788 questions • 9,469 answers • 945,758 learners
Getting that for you now...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,788 questions • 9,469 answers • 945,758 learners
Preguntando si algo sea un hecho o no, ¿qué se debería decir? Por ejemplo: ¿Es verdad que tengamos un examen hoy? o ¿Es verdad que tenemos un examen hoy? ¿Hay casos en que depende de lo que ya cree el hablante?
Yes - I made some mistakes, but very few. Why the terible score?
¿Cómo saber si estoy utilizando el pronombre correctamente? Me quedan dudas quando veo ejemplos como:
"Tiengo que grabárselas." Pero en la traducción al inglés veo "I need to record it for him".
¿Por qué "grabáserlas" y no "grabárselos"?
Muchas gracias.
Never mind, I figured out that "Notice how in Spanish we need to add "y" between the tens and the units (cincuenta y cuatro)" means the "y" is only after tens and not, say, for 3606.
Could this mean “Buy it for yourself.” if you are speaking formally?
ok it says son rojas not son roja so is plural i know spanish and i know how to respond and said it and written
Isn’t it ten simple conditional that is used to make supposition about the past?
In today's translation exercise - "Something’s not right in my new home" - I had to scratch my head really hard to understand why the phrase "objetos que no estaban donde los había dejado" had rendered "donde" without a tilde on the 'o'... Yes, it is a relative clause - but here, the 'connecting link-word' is "que" rather than "donde" > (" ... objects [which were] not where I had left them").
Initially, I thought I should be able to compare it with sentences structured round the verb "saber", for example:
"No sé dónde lo guardé"
and
"No sé dónde viven" -
[sentences given in my dictionary and grammar book].
Hi, I'm doing the quiz and ¿Usted lo ________ ? is the question - the correct answer is listed as comprende however the phrase can you understand it? is second person not 3rd so wouldn't comprendes be correct?
En este grupo de frases, ¿es que "las" significa implícitamente “las cosas”? O sea, ¿es que una frase como “vamos a arreglárnoslas para que todo vaya bien” se puede entender como “vamos a arreglarnos (las cosas) para que todo vaya bien”? ¡Gracias por la ayuda!
Find your Spanish level for FREE
Test your Spanish to the CEFR standard
Find your Spanish level