Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,883 questions • 9,620 answers • 964,215 learners
I'll be right with you...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,883 questions • 9,620 answers • 964,215 learners
Could you please clarify the statement "They replace the -z with a -c in all forms. This is because after z you can only have the vowels a, o and u."
1. The word "zeta" appears to disprove this statement so is there a further qualification to the rule that's missing?
2. Why can those letters not follow "z"?
Gracias!
What’s the reasoning for ruling out el pluscuamperfecto de subjuntivo?
de tantas horas que estuviera trabajandoI had a question on a kwiz that was marked "nearly" or "almost there"
Aquel restaurante, ________ me recomendó Alberto, tiene unos postres exquisitos.That restaurant, that Alberto recommended, has some exquisite desserts.
el cual was "correct"que was "nearly"
In the question and answer just below mine, an answer says that que and el cual are interchangable. Why was this answer not just marked correct? How do we know which one to use to get "correct" answers? Does the "nearly" count against me?
Which one is correct:
Tres es más que dos.
Tres es más de dos.
When using "a tan solo de que", is the verb in the subordinate clause in the subjunctive?
I wish it was better explained when to use this tense instead of just giving examples
When do you and when you don't use el/la/los/las?
I'm totally confused by this and always end up making the wrong choice.
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level