Invalid Question.
Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,989 questions • 9,792 answers • 1,006,011 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,989 questions • 9,792 answers • 1,006,011 learners
I´m going to guess I´m missing something stupid but why does this lesson title mention Imperfecto? Surely it´s all about Poder in El Futuro Simple, not Imperfecto?
¨Conjugate irregular verb poder in the future tense in Spanish (El Futuro Simple/Imperfecto)¨
In the quiz I got mi madre tine dos primos and I put Itanianas but the correct answer was Italianos why is this? I thought since they are talking about a woman it would be a feminine. Sorry if this sounds rly stupid just really stumped me.
En el ejemplo "Siempre ellos están cominedo chocolates", no significa que ahora mismo comen chocolates sino en general comen chocolates. Asi que creo que la oración corecta es "Siempre ellos comen chocolates". No necesito user presente progresivo. ¿Correcto?
other than habia how can you say there was/there were
Shouldn't the correct answer be 'alguno‘? The quiz says correct answer is 'algunos'. Even the AI said correct answer is 'alguno'.
I doesn’t make any difference what the lister knows or doesn’t know. It is what the speaker perceives. Your explanation makes understanding the tooic moe confusing. Sorry
why am I getting "zero" scores when the only thing I am messing up is punctuation?
Would it be incorrect to use a pronoun or even a named subject in the que clause in order to clarify specifically who one is talking about since 1st and 3rd person singular forms are the same?
Using the examples above:
Han hecho que reconsidere la oferta.
(odd but gramatically correct) Me han hecho que reconsidere la oferta. (???)
Similar to other subjunctive que clauses could I say:
Han hecho que yo reconsidere la oferta.
or Han hecho que ella reconsidere la oferta.
or even Han hecho que (a?) Maria reconsidere la oferta.
Or does this just need to be understood from further context?
Small clarification: does cocer actually mean "to boil"?
I thought it meant to cook in a hot water, not exactly "boil".
If I am wrong then how is it different from hervir?
Thank you in advance.
Does using the accidental se structure require the use of the perfect tense [haber (conjugated to item forgotten)+ past participle "olvidado"] or can I use the preterite (indefinido) also?
For example:
Perfect -> Se me ha olvidado la toalla.
Preterite -> Se me olvidó la toalla.
Sounds weird, but just asking for clarification since I didn't see any discussion of specifically using the HABER + Olvidado structure.
Cheers!
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level