Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,714 questions • 9,210 answers • 907,128 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,714 questions • 9,210 answers • 907,128 learners
Hi Inma
Am I right to assume that these essentially translate into English as the same thing? Otherwise, could you explain any other differences in meaning that might exist?
1) Su avión ha debido retrasarse
2) Su avión debe haberse retrasado
AND that adding 'de' also makes no difference to the meaning (other than maybe 'strengthening' the assumption as we learned about here: Spanish modal verb Deber versus Deber de (obligation and assumption))?
Saludos
Nope. No real instruction can convey with clarity how to use the different past tenses in Spanish. This is just another attempt here to try and make it "clear." it is not.
Spanish fluency was a goal of mine, but really not so much any longer. Basically, because no one can really "instruct" on how to learn the language. The only way to learn it is to revert to "infancy" and just hear it spoken. So, move to a Spanish-speaking country or region and pick up what you can. Most disheartening thing I have ever attempted to do is learning Spanish.
why is my answer to this question wrong? ________ votos.
Forty-one thousand votes.Cuarenta y un mil (correct answer)cuarentiún mil (my answer)
I just saw it in the forum and I think it should be added to the lesson since it is quite common.
Since The main differences between ser and estar include that ser is used for permanent qualities, like your name, your place of origin, and your physical appearance, while estar is used to talk about temporary situations, such as how you’re feeling right now or your location.
So why is SER used in this sentence: Tú eras muy bueno. - the person that you are talking to is not always good so it is not a permant state.
Ditto in the following sentence. You are not always rich so why use SER in the following: Vosotros erais ricos.
What is the difference between camarero and camarera
In the test question, How would you say "I have eaten only fruit for a week."?, the answer was Desde hace una semana solo como fruta.
But I chose Desde hace una semana solo he comido fruta. Why isn't that one correct, given the "have eaten?"
All the words are based on conserve rather than Conversar. Is this correct or am I missing something? Thank you very much!
Present tense
Subjunctiveyoconservo nosotrosconservamos yoconserve nosotrosconservemostúconservas vosotrosconserváis
túconserves vosotrosconservéisél conserva ellos conservan
él conserve ellos conserven
Why is it 'les' when referring to his family?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
Test your Spanish to the CEFR standard
Find your Spanish level