Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,077 questions • 9,955 answers • 1,036,437 learners
Getting that for you now...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,077 questions • 9,955 answers • 1,036,437 learners
Quizá Miguel no aprobó.Miguel may not have passed.
No sé qué me pasa; quizás estoy un poco nervioso.I don't know what is wrong with me; I may be a bit nervous.
many thanks julie
Sonia, De verdad. No podías guardártelo para ti
Why does one sentence use con terminación en., And the next sentence use que acaban en for the same English construction?
Suppose we want to say that a price has gone up from 20 pesos to 30 pesos. Could we say:
El precio ha aumentado de 20 pesos a 30 pesos.
El precio ha aumentado desde 20 pesos hasta 30 pesos.
Would either or both these statements be correct?
Thanks.
I was wondering how ir + gerund compares with andar + gerund?
Hola!
I'm having a hard time wrapping my mind around the purpose of doubling down on the indirect object usage in some of these examples:
"Ella le envió un regalo a Miguel.
She sent a present to Miguel."
In this example, why do you need the le if you already have Miguel. It reads to me literally as "she him sent a present to Miguel" and I suppose it feels like excessive and unnecessary additional language in an already clear sentence. Is it for emphasis? Por favor ayúdame a entender.
It is not intended, is it, that the second Example and Resource sentence above, "Vienen para solucionar el problema." is not translated into English?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level