Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,902 questions • 9,650 answers • 970,420 learners
I'll be right with you...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
5,902 questions • 9,650 answers • 970,420 learners
Could you highlight this difference in the lesson in yellow or some sort of emphasis?
If we want to express the same but in the negative, the structure changes to:
llevar (conjugated) + sin + infinitive
And also, if correct, please add the explanation that the action changes from past participle to infinitive because sin is a preposition, and that prepositions are followed by infinitives, not past particples.
the answer is ¡llegué en solo dos horas!
but can i say 'dentro de dos horas'?
"el pulque lo sirven en las pulquerias" why do we use "lo" in this sentence
hi what's the rule for using the subjunctive here?thank you
Voy para la casa de mi amigo. Is the use of para in this case particular to Spain? IN Mexico and New Mexico(where I live) I'm pretty sure the sentence would use the prepossition "a" as in Voy a la piscina.
Obviously Hacer does not mean to walk and we already know that the Camino is a walking event. Wouldn’t it be better to just go ahead and translate as “doing the Camino?” Perfectly acceptable English and a more accurate translation, it would seem.
It appears from your examples that “se” is optional, although I don’t see that explicitly stated. For example, “ Ayer me depilé las piernas.” doesn't have “se” in it.
Why do you use Un before the "jugador de fútbol"
Fernando ___ a Luisa... In another lesson you said that when naming the person, the "le, les" cannot be omitted. I used "estuvo explicándole" but the right answer is "estuvo explicando." Why? Thanks!
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level