First and second person pluralsNotice how for all these verbs, the vowel -e- from the infinitive that is closer to the end of the word becomes -i- except in the nosotros and vosotros forms.
Listen to these examples :
Ha dicho eso para que nos sintamos mejor.
He said that to make us feel better.
No os sintáis obligados a venir.
Don't feel obliged to come.
No mintamos más.
Let's not lie any more.
Is the wording correct, should "except" be deleted here?
Notice how for all these verbs, the vowel -e- from the infinitive that is closer to the end of the word becomes -i- IN the nosotros and vosotros forms.
Notice how for all these verbs, the vowel -e- from the infinitive that is closer to the end of the word becomes -i- except in the nosotros and vosotros forms.
Listen to these examples :
Ha dicho eso para que nos sintamos mejor.
He said that to make us feel better.
No os sintáis obligados a venir.
Don't feel obliged to come.
No mintamos más.
Let's not lie any more.
Is the wording correct, should "except" be deleted here?
Notice how for all these verbs, the vowel -e- from the infinitive that is closer to the end of the word becomes -i- IN the nosotros and vosotros forms.
May I respectfully draw your attention to your example immediately under 'The accidental 'se' with olvidarse and suggest as a literal translation
'The keys have forgotten themselves to me'? This accounts for the perfect tense and the reflexive 'se'.
You also give examples of forgettibg things 'accidentally'. Can one forget things 'on purpose'?
I'm not clear on the difference between Quedar and Quedarse when expressing results. The lesson says to use quedar to emphasize a result, and to use quedarse to express the result of a change. What's the difference, please? For instance, the following two examples seem pretty similar to me:
Seguro que quedarás contenta con tu pelado nuevo.
I am sure you will be/end up pleased with your new hair cut.
¡Laura va a quedarse pasmada con la noticia!
Laura will be astonished with the news!
Thanks.
Dice aquí “When we name the person
If we are more specific and either name the person or say who it is, for example "A María" or "A mi padre", the same rule applies. You cannot omit the "short" pronoun.” Pero según el RAE dice “ Pero si el complemento tónico aparece pospuesto al verbo, las condiciones para la coaparición del pronombre átono son diferentes según que el complemento sea directo o indirecto: En el caso del complemento indirecto, la coaparición del pronombre átono es normalmente opcional y suele ser lo más frecuente, especialmente en la lengua oral: No (les) da importancia a los problemas; (Les) he contado nuestro secreto a unos amigos; (Le) han denegado la beca a Juan; (Le) he dicho la verdad a mi madre. E incluso hay verbos, como gustar, encantar y sinónimos, que exigen la presencia del pronombre átono junto con el complemento tónico: ¿Le gustan a tu hermana los bombones? (y no *¿Gustan a tu hermana los bombones?)”
I was confused by the hint given for the first sentence:
Use lo que + verb + subj for emphasis ...
I interpreted "subj" as "subjunctive", and made quite a mess of my answer !
la compañía para que yo trabajo es el mejor.
Is this construct normally used in Spanish?
I’m confused, is there another way to determine when to use a direct or indirect pronoun? Eg, how do you apply “for whom, to whom” in this sentence:
Me explicó su porqué pero no le creí. She explained her reason but I didn't believe her.
Muchas gracias,Shirley.
Vosotros quisisteis comprar flores a Manuela.
Hi! In the above sentence, if the flowers were a present, would they buy them "para" instead of "a" Manuela? Just wondering if I'm correct that the "a" makes it more like a service than a present.
How can you start the lesson with "Antes de que and Antes que are always followed by the subjunctive. For example:"
Then in the last part of the lesson give examples without the subjunctive. That's the opposite of always.
Find your Spanish level for FREE
Test your Spanish to the CEFR standard
Find your Spanish level