Spanish language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,017 questions • 9,832 answers • 1,014,110 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert Spanish teachers
6,017 questions • 9,832 answers • 1,014,110 learners
Hello,
Still a bit confused on passive SE, and have a couple questions: (1) Do "no fault", "accidental" and "passive" SE all refer to the same thing? And (2) Would the correct Spanish translation for "Yesterday I fixed his computer, and he has already broken it" be "Ayer le arreglé la computadora (el ordenador) y ya se lo/le ha roto”. If correct, should I use “lo” (for “it”, the computer) or “le” as indirect object for “to him” (?). Thank you for your input and clarification.
The correct answer is mucha but selectedmucho because I thought the stress was on the first syllable. So is that not the casewith hambre?muchomucha
I keep being marked wrong. I get an usted question and the answer comes up with a vosotros question and answer.
Your "Exercise" has a spelling mistake in the English translation of El ejercicio es complicado. Should read the exercise is complicated.
Hello, in one of the lessons I read Tal Vez accepts both indicative and subjunctive, but when I included the indicative in my answer to the following question, it was marked wrong.
Tal vez ________ una gala benéfica para los niños pobres.
There might have been a charity gala for poor children.(HINT: Conjugate "haber" in El Imperfecto de Subjuntivo)hubohabríahubierahubieseCould you please explain?
¡Qué ________ sois vosotras dos! How aggressive you two are!(HINT: "peleón" = masculine for aggressive)… why is the answer peleonas?
Are ´con tal de que´and ´a condición de que´ interchangeable ?
Hello,
I am really confused, why abrir is irregular?
Find your Spanish level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your Spanish level