If estar is to be used with a location, why use ser to discuss where one is from?
Soy vs estoy
- « Back to Q&A Forum
- « Previous questionNext question »
Greg E.Kwiziq community member
Soy vs estoy
This question relates to:Spanish lesson "Using Soy de [city/country] to say where you are from in Spanish"
Asked 5 years ago
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80ca5/80ca5adee4f30053255bf9c4706221bd61456505" alt=""
InmaKwiziq Head of Spanish, Native Spanish Teacher
Hola Greg
The second context (where you are from) is not so much about where something/someone is located; it is referring to the "origin" (in this case it is ser):
Estoy en Madrid (I am [located] in Madrid)
This one says where the person is physically.
Soy de Madrid (I am [originally] from Madrid)
This one doesn't say where the person is physically, but where he/she comes from.
Un saludo
Inma
Roxana M.Kwiziq community member
Because ser is to be in a situation that does not change. You will be for ever from your birthtown. But estar is to be in a situation that does change. Today you are in Madrid, tomorrow you are in New York.
Don't have an account yet? Join today
Ask a questiondata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/687c0/687c087ba72e089e9e52df00800e8054ea446dc4" alt="Kwizbot, a friendly bot"
Find your Spanish level for FREE
Test your Spanish to the CEFR standard
Find your Spanish level