Celebrate the holidays! Save 20% on annual and biennial Premium »

hasta que no

Paolo -.C1Kwiziq community member

hasta que no

Hello, in another context, I have come across the expression: 
No le di la mano hasta que no supe su nombre.
Would it also be correct, and have the same meaning, to omit the second "no" ?
And, in the 3rd example on this page, could one also say: 
No vas a salir de casa hasta que no recojas tu habitación.
? 

thanks!

This question relates to:Spanish lesson "Using Spanish adverbial clauses para que, antes (de) que, hasta que, con tal (de) que, etc. + the present subjunctive (El Presente de Subjuntivo)"
Asked 1 year ago
Like0Answer1
Share
InmaNative Spanish expert teacher in KwiziqCorrect answer

Hola Paolo 

Yes, it is very common and equally correct to add a second negative element to the subordinate clause with hasta que (even when we don't need it). For this we need a negative main clause: "No.... hasta que (no)..." Here is a bit of information (in Spanish) about this practice: 

hasta que/hasta que no

I hope it helps

Saludos cordiales 

Felices Fiestas 

Inma

Like01 year ago
Share
Paolo -. asked:View original

hasta que no

Hello, in another context, I have come across the expression: 
No le di la mano hasta que no supe su nombre.
Would it also be correct, and have the same meaning, to omit the second "no" ?
And, in the 3rd example on this page, could one also say: 
No vas a salir de casa hasta que no recojas tu habitación.
? 

thanks!

Sign in to submit your answer

Don't have an account yet? Join today

« estar + hechosuperbly enunciated »
Ask a question

Find your Spanish level for FREE

Test your Spanish to the CEFR standard

Find your Spanish level
I'll be right with you...