"she bought it for herself"?
When there is an indirect pronoun in a sentence we use: me, te, le, nos, os, les. However when the indirect pronouns le and les (meaning to him / to her / to them) are accompanied by the direct pronoun lo, la, los or las (meaning it / them) then le and les become se to avoid a clumsy sounding le lo, le la, les los etc, which is tricky to pronounce. Listen to this example:
Remember that no matter how many different pronouns are used in the sentence, the indirect one comes first and the direct one comes after.
Listen to these examples:
No se lo dije.
I didn't say it to her.
Se la dimos.
We gave it to them.
Quiero comprárselos.
I want to buy them for them.
María está comprándoselos.
María is buying them for him.
No sabemos por qué se los ofrecieron.
We don't know why they offered them to them.
Note that se has a different position depending on the verb form.
With a conjugated verb, se is separate to the verb and in front.
Se la dimos.
With an infinitive, imperative or gerund, se comes straight after the verb form as part of the same word.
Quiero comprárselos. (infinitive)
Cómpraselos. (imperative)
Estoy comprándoselos. (gerund)
ATTENTION: When the gerund or infinitive are acompanied by a conjugated verb it is also correct to place the se in front of the conjugated verb, but never between the conjugated verb and the gerund or infinitive. Here are some examples to show the two possibilities:
No se lo puedo apretar.
I cannot tighten it for her.
No puedo apretárselo.
I cannot tighten it for her.
Here are some more examples:
Las zapatillas pónselas al lado de la cama.
The slippers, put them next to the bed for her.
No se los pagues, él tiene bastante dinero.
Don't pay those for him, he has enough money.
¿Por qué no se lo comunicaste antes?
Why didn't you let them know about it before?
Se lo daré cuando la vea.
I will give it to her when I see her.
El regalo, yo se lo dejé ahí.
The present, I left it there for him.
¿Crees que se lo habrá dicho ya?
Do you think she will have told him yet?
Pregúntaselo ahora mismo.
Ask her about it right now.
Estoy montándoselas en el salón.
I am putting them up for him in the living room.
See also:
Using lo, la, los, las = him, her, it, them (direct object pronouns)
Using le and les = [to] it,him, her, them (indirect object pronouns)
Learn more about these related Spanish grammar topics
Examples and resources
Se lo daré cuando la vea.
I will give it to her when I see her.
¿Por qué no se lo comunicaste antes?
Why didn't you let them know about it before?
Quiero comprárselos.
I want to buy them for them.
Se la estamos decorando.
We are decorating it for him.
No se los pagues, él tiene bastante dinero.
Don't pay those for him, he has enough money.
No sabemos por qué se los ofrecieron.
We don't know why they offered them to them.
¿Crees que se lo habrá dicho ya?
Do you think she will have told him yet?
Laura se lo compró.
Laura bought it for her.
Las zapatillas pónselas al lado de la cama.
The slippers, put them next to the bed for her.
Estoy montándoselas en el salón.
I am putting them up for him in the living room.
María está comprándoselos.
María is buying them for him.
Se la dimos.
We gave it to them.
Estamos decorándosela.
We are decorating it for him.
Pregúntaselo ahora mismo.
Ask her about it right now.
No se lo dije.
I didn't say it to her.
El regalo, yo se lo dejé ahí.
The present, I left it there for him.
No se lo puedo apretar.
I cannot tighten it for her.
No puedo apretárselo.
I cannot tighten it for her.
Q&A Forum 2 questions, 4 answers
InmaKwiziq language super star
Hola Emanuel
That sentence could actually mean both:
"Laura se lo compró" (Laura bought it for herself) [comprarse algo = to buy something for oneself]
or
"Laura se lo compró (Laura bought it for her/him/them) [comprar algo a alguien = to buy something for someone]
Saludos
Inma
Don't have an account yet? Join today
to or for
The confusing part is not se vs le for me but "to" vs "for." Your explanation was that an indirect object means to him/it, etc., but the example is "for him", which is very different in English. I think this needs to be explained. When I speak I usually try to clarify with "para mi" for "for me", but it may not be right.
Tom
Asked 3 months ago
InmaKwiziq language super star
Hola Tom
The translation for these indirect object pronouns are normally "to him/her/them" as we state in the lesson. However, with verb "comprar" it is not possible to translate them as "to him/her/them", but their function in the sentence won't change. They will still be indirect object pronouns. In English you wouldn't say "I want to buy them to them", but "for them" for "Quiero comprárselos."
We could also use "para ellos" instead, so you are right when you say you normally use "para" for "for", so we could say the same sentence like this:
"Quiero comprarlos para ellos", but if we decide to use an indirect object pronoun for "para ellos" then we need "se".
I hope this clarified your doubt.
Saludos
Inma
Tom asked:View original
to or for
The confusing part is not se vs le for me but "to" vs "for." Your explanation was that an indirect object means to him/it, etc., but the example is "for him", which is very different in English. I think this needs to be explained. When I speak I usually try to clarify with "para mi" for "for me", but it may not be right.
Tom
Don't have an account yet? Join today
