Con el no me divierto. Why isn't the explanation logical?

RA2Kwiziq community member

Con el no me divierto. Why isn't the explanation logical?

I get it.  Le is not the correct answer for a reason, but not the reason given in the lesson examples.  Just because the preposition "con" is always followed by a subject pronoun is insufficient explanation.  It implies that "con" was already a given, but it was not.  I believe that "le" is an indirect object/pronoun and therefore not correct.  

Asked 6 months ago
InmaKwiziq team member

Hola R,

There is a note by the end of the lesson saying now that you must not use other type of pronouns with "con" and links to these pronouns (direct object and indirect object pronouns)

I hope this helps,

Saludos,

Inma

Con el no me divierto. Why isn't the explanation logical?

I get it.  Le is not the correct answer for a reason, but not the reason given in the lesson examples.  Just because the preposition "con" is always followed by a subject pronoun is insufficient explanation.  It implies that "con" was already a given, but it was not.  I believe that "le" is an indirect object/pronoun and therefore not correct.  

Sign in to submit your answer

Don't have an account yet? Join today

Ask a question

Find your Spanish level for FREE

Test your Spanish to the CEFR standard

Find your Spanish level
I'll be right with you...